<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the most common renewable energy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/</link>
	<description>Your Renewable Energy Questions answered</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Call me Batman</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Call me Batman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Solar energy is responsible for all of the other kinds, so technically you could argue that it's the 'most common'.

If you are referring to which energy source generates the most power, then hydro is almost definitely the winner (I don't actually have a source to prove that, so I say 'almost definitely'). Hydro probably provides more energy then all of the others combined.

And of course, if you were to focus on very specific areas, then it would depend. Some places simply don't have anywhere to put a hydro plant, so they may put windmills instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar energy is responsible for all of the other kinds, so technically you could argue that it&#8217;s the &#8216;most common&#8217;.</p>
<p>If you are referring to which energy source generates the most power, then hydro is almost definitely the winner (I don&#8217;t actually have a source to prove that, so I say &#8216;almost definitely&#8217;). Hydro probably provides more energy then all of the others combined.</p>
<p>And of course, if you were to focus on very specific areas, then it would depend. Some places simply don&#8217;t have anywhere to put a hydro plant, so they may put windmills instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cirric</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Cirric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/05/what-is-the-most-common-renewable-energy/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Hi. Hydro is the most common, at least for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Hydro is the most common, at least for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
