<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Renewable Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renewablepowers.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renewablepowers.com</link>
	<description>Your Renewable Energy Questions answered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by treatfaerie</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>treatfaerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>McCain is definitely gonna drill, and Palin strengthens that orientation. Given that drilling will not impact our market prices for 10 years and then by negligible amounts. He has paid lip service to a few alternatives, with a small list of solar, geothermal and wind, because those are on every one's lipsafter thee competitions speeches.

Obama is quite clear that drilling can be considered nothing more than a brief stop gap solution and that we need to turn to as many alternate techniques to answer our energy appetites as we can find. He stresses doing the research to come up with new energy frontiers, and following up on ones that have the least negative impact on theenvironmentt. He is also confident that this line of industry will create many jobs, and will encourage ourpopulationn to be more aware of the consequences of our energy intensive lifestyles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is definitely gonna drill, and Palin strengthens that orientation. Given that drilling will not impact our market prices for 10 years and then by negligible amounts. He has paid lip service to a few alternatives, with a small list of solar, geothermal and wind, because those are on every one&#8217;s lipsafter thee competitions speeches.</p>
<p>Obama is quite clear that drilling can be considered nothing more than a brief stop gap solution and that we need to turn to as many alternate techniques to answer our energy appetites as we can find. He stresses doing the research to come up with new energy frontiers, and following up on ones that have the least negative impact on theenvironmentt. He is also confident that this line of industry will create many jobs, and will encourage ourpopulationn to be more aware of the consequences of our energy intensive lifestyles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by m1a1mikegolf</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>m1a1mikegolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>McCain has the more realistic plan.  McCain wants to continue development of alternative energy sources while at the same time use existing technology to ensure that our energy needs are actually met.

Alternative energy has been promising great things for 30 years and has never delivered on its promises.  It is foolish to assume that - contrary to past experience - alternative energy will produce a realistic energy supply in the next 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain has the more realistic plan.  McCain wants to continue development of alternative energy sources while at the same time use existing technology to ensure that our energy needs are actually met.</p>
<p>Alternative energy has been promising great things for 30 years and has never delivered on its promises.  It is foolish to assume that - contrary to past experience - alternative energy will produce a realistic energy supply in the next 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by williambweh</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>williambweh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>putting ur neck on iABM sen.obama 'll be more like conmating suicide.
everything he's saying sound real good,but if elected",'ll he put them into action?that's the big question.I hope it's not just to win or polities asusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>putting ur neck on iABM sen.obama &#8216;ll be more like conmating suicide.<br />
everything he&#8217;s saying sound real good,but if elected&#8221;,&#8217;ll he put them into action?that&#8217;s the big question.I hope it&#8217;s not just to win or polities asusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by Michelle S</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>I think they both have good plans..

The biggest difference McCain offers incentives from the Government, and some funds. Obama offers the money up front.
He is offering a reward for the the company coming up with a battery, and he is outlining what that battery has to have. he is offering more than Obama is but.
Obama is offering the money up front. If they succeed, or do not.

Down sides to Obamas plan
To me the biggest difference is. If you have ever worked for a government contractor, they just try to find a way to spend the money, if they don't spend it, they lose it. So they pay people more than needed, they have bigger Christmas parties, as well they stretch the research out over the time of the contract.

McCains plan is going to cause companies to compete, and no government money up front, no contract. McCains plan will encourage companies like ford, and GM.
If Ford, or GM is the loser in that race, they really do not lose, they get to use that technology any way.
Obamas plan will encourage companies wanting to win that contract, possibly companies that would then sell the technology to companies like Ford, GM. Would cost us more in the long run.

Other big difference McCain wants nuclear plants in 5 years, and he wants off shore drilling.

Obama recently flipped and said he would allow off shore drilling, so i don't know if that he would or not.

McCains plan offers energy plan for the future, and sooner relief than Obamas plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they both have good plans..</p>
<p>The biggest difference McCain offers incentives from the Government, and some funds. Obama offers the money up front.<br />
He is offering a reward for the the company coming up with a battery, and he is outlining what that battery has to have. he is offering more than Obama is but.<br />
Obama is offering the money up front. If they succeed, or do not.</p>
<p>Down sides to Obamas plan<br />
To me the biggest difference is. If you have ever worked for a government contractor, they just try to find a way to spend the money, if they don&#8217;t spend it, they lose it. So they pay people more than needed, they have bigger Christmas parties, as well they stretch the research out over the time of the contract.</p>
<p>McCains plan is going to cause companies to compete, and no government money up front, no contract. McCains plan will encourage companies like ford, and GM.<br />
If Ford, or GM is the loser in that race, they really do not lose, they get to use that technology any way.<br />
Obamas plan will encourage companies wanting to win that contract, possibly companies that would then sell the technology to companies like Ford, GM. Would cost us more in the long run.</p>
<p>Other big difference McCain wants nuclear plants in 5 years, and he wants off shore drilling.</p>
<p>Obama recently flipped and said he would allow off shore drilling, so i don&#8217;t know if that he would or not.</p>
<p>McCains plan offers energy plan for the future, and sooner relief than Obamas plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by margaret h</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>margaret h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>McCain.

Obama is in complete denial about our short term, intermediate and even long-term need for petroleum.
He deceives people when he tells them that we can eliminate our dependence on oil and that we can do it in a decade.
We can't switch most of our use in even two or three decades and we will ALWAYS need petroleum.

McCain wants to pursue EVERYTHING. ALL alternatives. 
If you think otherwise, you have not been listening.

Obama is willing to exclude some alternatives to placate some of his special interest supporters. 
That is unacceptable if we are going to be energy independent. 
He has been bought and sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain.</p>
<p>Obama is in complete denial about our short term, intermediate and even long-term need for petroleum.<br />
He deceives people when he tells them that we can eliminate our dependence on oil and that we can do it in a decade.<br />
We can&#8217;t switch most of our use in even two or three decades and we will ALWAYS need petroleum.</p>
<p>McCain wants to pursue EVERYTHING. ALL alternatives.<br />
If you think otherwise, you have not been listening.</p>
<p>Obama is willing to exclude some alternatives to placate some of his special interest supporters.<br />
That is unacceptable if we are going to be energy independent.<br />
He has been bought and sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by Weasel McWeasel</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel McWeasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>what you said!

Did ya see the convention? 

the people with the oil rigs on their heads? 

That's their thinking..........off shore drilling will solve everything.........feed the poor, fix the economy, raise the Titanic, and even get rid of bathroom scum!

It also makes great FERTILIZER......because that's what that plan is..............all B.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what you said!</p>
<p>Did ya see the convention? </p>
<p>the people with the oil rigs on their heads? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s their thinking&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.off shore drilling will solve everything&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;feed the poor, fix the economy, raise the Titanic, and even get rid of bathroom scum!</p>
<p>It also makes great FERTILIZER&#8230;&#8230;because that&#8217;s what that plan is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..all B.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by Rich N</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Obama. McCain and Palin are working for the oil companies lobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama. McCain and Palin are working for the oil companies lobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the difference between renewable and inexhaustible energy resources? by Loren S</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/09/what-is-the-difference-between-renewable-and-inexhaustible-energy-resources/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/11/09/what-is-the-difference-between-renewable-and-inexhaustible-energy-resources/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>the suns light is inexhaustible wood for a fire is renewable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the suns light is inexhaustible wood for a fire is renewable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by Bettee62</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bettee62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>MCCAIN &#038; PALIN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MCCAIN &#038; PALIN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which candidate has a better plan for renewable energy? by jack w</title>
		<link>http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>jack w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renewablepowers.com/2008/10/11/which-candidate-has-a-better-plan-for-renewable-energy/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Obama has stated that he will look for alternative solutions, including natural gas, solar and possibly more drilling. The US Dept of Energy said drilling in Anwar would lower the price of a BBL of oil 75 cents. so whats the rush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has stated that he will look for alternative solutions, including natural gas, solar and possibly more drilling. The US Dept of Energy said drilling in Anwar would lower the price of a BBL of oil 75 cents. so whats the rush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
